jeudi 1 octobre 2015

Colleges Paying Sketchy Agents To Recruit Rich Foreign Students

(Joachim Rayos)
With schools looking for ways to bolster their bottom lines without having to rely on federal funding, a growing number of colleges are paying recruiters to bring in well-heeled students from overseas — even though some of these agents have been caught trying to fake applicants’ transcripts.

It’s illegal for colleges to pay per-student commissions for recruiting agents if those students get federal financial aid. But this sort of arrangement is perfectly legal if an agent is rewarded for attracting foreign students who aren’t eligible for that aid.

The Wall Street Journal reports that an estimated 1-in-4 colleges now pay independent overseas recruiters to identify and woo applicants.

Wichita State University in Kansas pays up to $1,600 per enrolled student to these agents. As a result, it has seen foreign student applications shoot up “precipitously” since 2013.

And while it might make sense both financially for schools to target international students who often pay higher tuition, critics say the independent recruiting system is rife with fraud and other problems.

Wichita State acknowledges that it had to cut ties with an agent it suspected of faking transcripts. The school rejected those applicants but continues to use agents.

Dickinson State University in North Dakota stopped using agents after it was sanctioned by its accrediting body. An audit of the school found that agent-recruited students weren’t fulfilling graduation requirements.

It’s not just schools that are hiring agents. A large number of students in China looking to attend U.S. schools also hire these same recruiters. That means the agents may be getting paid twice for doing one job.

A U.C. Berkeley student from China tells the Journal that his family paid around $30,000 to have an agent redo his application essay. He says he was told that “no one knows about the whole application process better than they do so I had no choice.”

A student at NYU, the school with the highest percentage of international students in the U.S., admits to paying $26,000 to have her essay ghostwritten. The story told in her essay — about her father reforming his life after being dragged out of a gambling den — didn’t actually happen to her.



Amazon To Prohibit The Sale Of Apple TV, Google Chromecast

Amazon says it will stop selling rival streaming services Google Chromecast and Apple TV.

Amazon appears to be taking a page out of Apple’s playbook by removing competitors’ products from its virtual shelves. The e-commerce giant said today that would prohibit the sale of video-streaming devices from rivals Google and Apple that aren’t compatible with its own Prime video service. 

In an email to marketplace sellers, Amazon said it would stop selling Apple TV and Google’s Chromecast, Bloomberg reports.

The online retailer said that sellers would be prohibited from posting new listings for the products starting immediately, while current postings will be taken down Oct. 29.

According to Amazon, the decision to remove the products came about because of difficulties streaming Amazon’s Prime service on Chromecast and Apple TV.

“Over the last three years, Prime Video has become an important part of Prime,” Amazon said. “It’s important that the streaming media players we sell interact well with Prime Video in order to avoid customer confusion.”

Amazon will continue to sell devices that work with Prime, like the Microsoft Xbox and Sony PlayStation consoles.

While it might make sense to stop selling products that don’t work with your preferred system, not all Amazon customers are Prime members and have access to the streaming service.

“Fewer than 20% of Amazon customers are Prime members,” Michael Pachter, a financial analyst, tells Bloomberg. “What about the 80% who want an Apple TV to stream Netflix? I think that the excuse of avoiding customer confusion is a not-so-veiled attempt to favor Amazon first-party products over third-party products, and think it was a bad move.”

Amazon to Ban Sale of Apple, Google Video-Streaming Devices [Bloomberg]



GM Testing Car-Sharing Program In NYC As Alternative To Zipcar, Uber

(Jeremy Schultz)
Though carmakers are painfully aware that people living in big cities are less likely to own a car than in less densely populated areas, where public transit isn’t as convenient of an option, that isn’t keeping them from trying to get a foothold one way or another in those markets. At some point or another, even city dwellers find themselves in need of a car. To that end, General Motors is testing a car-sharing program in Manhattan, to rival services like Uber and Zipcar.

GM is kicking off the pilot program — called Let’s Drive NYC — for residents of an apartment complex in Times Square, offering rentals either for $10 per hour or $75 per day, the company said in a press release. Customers in the test program can opt for either a Chevrolet Trax compact sport utility vehicle or Chevy Equinox small SUV.

If the test is successful, the company could roll it out to elsewhere — there are already plans to give it a go in another U.S. city that GM isn’t identifying.

“We view evolving consumer preferences, such as car-sharing, as real business opportunities,” President Dan Ammann said.

Let’s Drive NYC starts today and costs less than Zipcar, which charges $12.75 per hour during the week and $94 for a day and more on weekends. Residents of the apartment complex included in the pilot program will also get three hours of free rentals per month when they make their rent payments.

GM isn’t the first to introduce a car-sharing program, albeit this one is a bit different: Ford launched a peer-to-peer service in six cities recently that allows individual car owners to rent their vehicles out to strangers via an app.



National Park Service Hiking Entry Fees At 130 Parks To Raise Money Needed For Repairs

(_jwong)
Before you head to Yosemite or Yellowstone for your next trip, you might want to check the price of admission: the National Park Service is hiking entry fees at 130 locations in order to raise money it needs to fix trails, bridges, and buildings visitors use every day. In some cases, prices will double, or even triple.

Passes for Yosemite in California, for example, will jump from $20 to $30 for a single vehicle entry, the Rocky Mountain in Colorado will see an annual pass go from $40 to $80 and an annual pass for the Everglades will now cost $40 instead of $25.

Fees for camping, showering, paddleboating, and cave tours at 176 parks will also see a hike, reports the Washington Post.

The National Park Service needs $11.5 billion to do all the repairs necessary to keep up with the 293 million people who visit the parks each year, National Parks director Jonathan Jarvis told the Associated Press.

“We cannot greet them with rundown facilities,” he told the Associated Press.

Most parks haven’t seen entry fees go up since 2008 or some, since 2006. Fee increases were put on hold during the recession, so people would still show up.

If you’re not into paying entry fees, there are two days coming up where all parks will be free to access: on Oct. 8, to celebrate “Senior Skip Day,” says a rep from the NPS, as well as Veterans Day, Nov. 11. If you want extras like camping or boats, you’ll still have to pay for those services and reservations.



The Narwhal Bacon Box Is Not Clear On The Concept Of ‘Monthly’ Subscription Boxes

11401249_384769721726108_5423980211676643674_nThe appeal of monthly subscription boxes is that, um, you get a subscription box. Monthly. That’s why customers are so disappointed in the Narwhal Bacon Box, which promised to be a monthly box with Reddit-themed content. It hasn’t managed to ship any boxes yet.

Bob Brown at Network World gave the box a try for a month and couldn’t tell his readers whether a subscription would be worth their time because he doesn’t have the box yet. The box for July.

“I guess I should have been concerned about NBB from the start when I received email on July 28 informing me that my box would arrive in mid-July,” he wrote. “Oh, maybe they meant 2016?” That’s a lot of lead time, so probably not.

He’s not alone, though. The startup’s Facebook page is full of posts from customers complaining that they haven’t received July or August boxes, and September’s hasn’t shipped yet either.

The company claims that they’ve had problems sourcing their products and with “fulfillment,” or actually getting the boxes shipped out.

Reddit-inspired Narwhal Bacon Box is fizzling, not sizzling [Network World]



L.A.-Based Auto Lender Must Pay $48M In Fines, Refunds For Illegal Collections

(Eric Norris)

For the second time this week, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has flexed its muscles when it comes to reining in unscrupulous indirect auto loan financiers. Just days after taking action against Fifth Third Bank for auto-lending discrimination, the Bureau ordered a Los Angeles-based finance company and its auto title lending subsidiary to pay $48.3 million in fines and relief to affected borrowers stemming from a laundry list of allegedly illegal debt collection practices.

A proposed consent order [PDF] accuses Westlake Services and Wilshire Consumer Credit of using a variety of legally questionable tactics since at least 2010.

These include: using phony caller ID information; falsely threatening to refer borrowers for criminal prosecution; and illegally disclosing information about debts to borrowers’ employers, friends, and family.

Westlake Services, which specializes in purchasing and servicing auto loans, including many subprime and near-subprime loans, purchased loans from auto dealers nationwide. Wilshire Consumer Credit, a wholly owned subsidiary of Westlake, offers auto title loans directly to consumers, largely via the Internet, and services those loans. The company also purchases and services auto title loans made by others.

An investigation by the CFPB found that starting in January 2010, the companies’ debt collectors began using a web-based service called Skip Tracy — which allowed them to change the phone number and caller ID that recipients see — to place calls to more than 137,000 loan borrowers.

The Bureau found that collectors altered the calls to make it appear they were coming from other entities, including repossession companies. The debt collectors would then pretend during the call that they were calling from repossession companies and make threats that the borrowers’ vehicles were in immediate danger of being repossessed.

Collectors also allegedly used Skip Tracy to make it appear as if other businesses were contacting customers, with IDs showing things like “flower shop.” The collectors then kept up the ruse by posing as a flower shop employee in order to trick customers into disclosing their location or the location of their vehicle.

In other instances, the complaint states that the companies used the phone service to make it look as if they were calling from investigation or enforcement divisions.

“The companies explicitly and implicitly threatened to file criminal charges against consumers even when they had not decided to refer the borrowers to criminal authorities,” the CFPB says.”These tactics likely misled consumers into believing they needed to make a payment urgently to avoid an investigation.”

From January 2010 to April 2014, Westlake and Wilshire called consumers whose vehicles had already been repossessed and used Skip Tracy to make it appear the calls were coming from a party associated with the word “storage.”

During these calls, collectors falsely implied that the that the vehicles would be released if the borrowers made a partial payment on the account. In reality, the companies would actually only release a repossessed vehicle after a borrower paid the full amount due.

The companies also illegally contacted borrowers’ employers, friends, and family members about overdue debts.

According to the CFPB complaint, the companies paid a third-party repossession company to make debt collection calls to borrowers, even when the companies had not decided to repossess the consumers’ vehicles or the companies had no reason to believe repossession was imminent.

“This tactic likely misled consumers into believing that they needed to make a payment urgently to avoid repossession,” the CFPB claims.

In addition to deceiving consumers with illegal debt collection practices, the CFPB found Westlake and Wilshire violated consumer financial protection laws with advertising, customer relations and account servicing.

From Jan. 2010 to Sept. 2010 the company deceived borrowers about the effects of due date changes or extensions to loan terms, as well as hid the true cost of credit.

Specifically, the CFPB found that Wilshire used monthly interest rates or other interest rates in advertisements for auto title loans in 2012 and 2013, without disclosing the loans’ annual percentage rate as required by law.

Monthly rates advertised by Wilshire only appeared in small print on its website. Representatives speaking with prospective borrowers on the phone would answer questions about the cost of loans by providing monthly rates or other rates instead of the annual percentage rate.

Under the terms of a proposed CFPB consent order, Wilshire and Westlake must provide $44.1 million in redress to affected borrowers. The funds will be issued in the form of $25.8 million in cash, while the remainder will come from balance reductions to open accounts.

The company must also pay a $4.25 million civil penalty to the CFPB’s Civil Penalty Fund, as well as end deceptive debt collection practices, protect consumers’ private information and end unlawful advertisements.



Local Postmaster Shows Up At Guy’s Door To Personally Apologize For USPS Package Tracking Mix-Up

(.sanden.)
Remember Tony? He’s the guy who was waiting around for a package to be delivered by the U.S. Postal Service, only to find that the online tracking said a carrier had attempted to deliver it while he was out briefly — an event that video from his home security system proved never happened. While it’s still unclear what exactly led to the contradicting tracking info — something many, many of our readers have said they’ve experienced — there’s a happy ending in this case at least: Tony says the new postmaster in charge of his local office showed up on Wednesday to personally apologize to him for the mix-up.

Tony has been keeping in touch with us since Consumerist posted his story on Tuesday, writing that yesterday, the new postmaster on the job at his local USPS branch — who had been on the job all of three weeks before this incident landed in her lap — had dropped by to talk to him about his experience, and collect more information about his delivery timeline (USPS reps had asked Consumerist to connect them with Tony, but his tracking info was also included in the credits of his video, so his guess is that’s what led to her visit).

She also wanted to know more about Tony’s previous attempts to address his problems through “official” channels — filing a complaint online as well as calling USPS, to no avail — “so she can take appropriate action up and down the chain,” Tony says.

As it turns out, both the “no secure location” and “delivered: front porch notifications” were actual scans, and not automated systems updating the info at predetermined times, Tony adds, which was one possible explanation a former USPS worker had offered Consumerist.

Tony says he also wants to give a shoutout to his usual mail carrier, “a great guy,” who happened to be on vacation when the mix-up with substitute mail carriers occurred.

“He knocked REALLY loud today when he delivered my package,” Tony wrote, noting that he feels bad if the video got him into any trouble. He says he made it clear during the postmaster’s visit that his carrier is a good guy.

“I’m sure she has a lot on her plate with her new job,” Tony says of the new postmaster, “but I’m confident that she’ll be able to get out ahead of it. I really doubt I’ll have any issues in the foreseeable future.”

If only it didn’t take widely-publicized videos and Internet shaming to make USPS take notice, perhaps invisible mail carriers leaving invisible packages would become a less frequent occurrence.